All Activity
This stream autoupdates
 Today

Kindly suggest some books and past papers for Merco psch paper a

Kindly suggest some books and past papers for MRcp psych paper a

Fawzia joined the community
 Yesterday

I think I am aware of it.

Dranj started following CASC changes

Please can someone guide me what are the CASC changes in station now as compared to before how many stations are now and 2hat is passing criterion thanks also if someone has compiled list o& more recent stations please share which course have you found most helpful for CASC which videos resource is most helpful any recommendation for books for CASC Thanks
 Last week

Tests of survival curves: (a) MantelHaenszel test (b) Logrank test (c) Cox proportional hazards test  MantelHaenszel test is almost the same as the logrank test. However, the MantelHaenszel test is restricted to 2 curves, whereas the logrank test may use > 2 curves.  The Cox proportional hazards test allows the risk for death to vary within the model, whereas the logrank test assumes it to be the same throughout. Types of Fixed Effects Methods: (if there's homogeneity in metaanalysis) (a) Fixedeffect inverse variance (b) MantelHaenszel (c) Fixedeffect Peto  When data are sparse (either low event rates / small study size), MantelHaenszel method has been shown to have better statistical properties when there are few events.  It uses a different weighting scheme that depends upon which effect measure (e.g. risk ratio, odds ratio, risk difference) is being used.

Cox's proportional hazards model  Commonest approach to model survival or time to event data.  It's analogous to a multiple regression model, and tests the difference between survival times of particular group, while allowing for other factors.  In this model, the dependent variable is the 'hazard', which is the probability of dying (or experiencing the event in question), given that patients have survived up to a given point in time, or the risk for death at that moment.  No assumption is made about the probability distribution of the hazard.  However, it is assumed that if the risk for dying at a particular point in time in one group is, say, twice that in the other group, then at any other time it will still be twice that in the other group. In other words, the hazard ratio does not depend on time. The hazard of failure in one group is a constant ratio (over time) of the hazard of failure in the other group. Log rank test does not assume proportional hazards per se.  Used to compare 2 survival curves, and tests whether there's a difference between the survival times of different groups. However, it does not allow other explanatory variables to be taken into account.  It's used to test the null hypothesis that "there is no difference between the population survival curves" (i.e. the probability of an event occurring at any time point is the same for each population).  It's the most powerful for detecting alternative hypotheses in which the hazards are proportional. Quick Reference: http://thestatsgeek.com/2017/09/21/survivalanalysispowerlogrankcoxversusrmst/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065034/

Alexis started following types of validity

My shortcut to remember subtypes of criterion/construct validity: CONstruct validity: CONvergent & divergent Criterion validity: Concurrent & predictive

Alexis started following Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV

I remember them this way and I think it's easier to understand. Sensitivity (e.g. of a screening test) Among those with the disease, how many will be correctly screened as positive? Specificity Among those without the disease, how many will be correctly screened as negative? Positive Predictive Value Among those who were screened positive, how many actually have the disease? Negative Predictive Value Among those who were screened negative, how many actually don't have the disease? Hope this helps

Performance bias  Happens when one group of subjects in an experiment (e.g., a control group or a treatment group) gets more attention from investigators than another group.  Can also refer to the fact that participants can change their responses if they know which group they are allocated in. (A set of Hawthorne effect) Observer bias (also called experimenter bias or research bias)  Tendency to see what we expect to see, or what we want to see. When a researcher studies a certain group, they usually come to an experiment with prior knowledge and subjective feelings about the group being studied.

Frigz joined the community

Daviep joined the community

MBR joined the community

Bijay Bhandari joined the community

Hi hi I know I'm 6 years late but just wanna try answering the question Chisquare is really just a special case of logistic regression, and this is analogous to the relationship between ANOVA & regression. (Ref: http://web.pdx.edu/~newsomj/pa551/lectur21.htm) Chisquare contingency analysis:  Independent variable is dichotomous  Dependent variable is dichotomous  Purpose: Used to determine whether there's significant difference between expected vs observed frequencies in one or more categories. Logistic regression is a more general analysis, because:  Independent variable is not necessarily dichotomous, and can have >1 independent variable.  Dependent variable (outcome) is dichotomous  Purpose: Predicts value of a dichotomous dependent variable (outcome) by using 1 independent variable & a constant.  E.g. How does the probability of getting lung cancer (yes vs. no) change for every additional pound a person is overweight and for every pack of cigarettes smoked per day? Here, outcome is dichotomous (gets lung cancer vs not getting lung cancer); there're >1 independent variables (weight & packs of cigarettes smoked per day). References: https://www.statisticssolutions.com/whatislogisticregression/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chisquared_test#Example_chisquared_test_for_categorical_data

Zaid Ahmed joined the community

General rule: Positive Predictive Value (PPV) increases with increasing prevalence. Negative Predictive Value (NPV) reduces with increasing prevalence. In this case, urban had higher prevalence. Thus, urban should have higher PPV, lower NPV. Rural should have lower PPV (option A is correct), higher NPV. Explanation: PPV = Out of those who were tested positive, how many actually had the disease? Thus, prevalence affects the PPV calculation. Sensitivity = Among those with disease, how many will be tested positive? So it doesn't actually matter how many ppl have the disease (prevalence is not important). The important point is, how many ppl will be tested positive.

Alexis started following Question April 2012 and October 2012
 Earlier

La Casa De Papel aka Money Heist on Netflix!

Hi
I hope you are well. sorry for the random message.
I noticed some of your paper B posts. I have the exam in 3 weeks time and wanted advice about prep? which questions banks/notes would you recommend?.im very bad with stats/ c appraisal
many thanks

Micheal M Moreed started following Study group paper a

Any one want to creat a study group what's app to help each other gathering and sharing information or sharing costs please contact me on what's app number +201553930314. Thanks in advance

Please add my number 00447412049949

Has anyone appeared for General adult interview, could possibly guide me on this scenario Thanks! You are an ST4 in Psychiatry in a community team. A care coordinator informs you that Sam, a carer, is in reception appearing anxious and distressed. He/she is demanding to see a senior doctor and has a complaint following a consultation with a CT1 doctor last week. Sam’s son Adrian has just recovered from a first episode psychosis and was discharged one month ago after admission under the Mental Health Act. Following last week’s consultation he is refusing medication Olanzapine due to worries about weight gain. You have Adrian’s permission to talk to family. You have 15 minutes with the carer, but you can finish earlier if you choose to do so.

Can anyone help. How many preferences should I put in my options. And out of no preferences will they allocate anyone or in a particular order from top to bottom. Also if I am offered a post which I don’t like can I decline it. Will I get more offers then.

i have cleared my neetpg this year(its an exam to get pg in India) and can join MD in psych. im confused about my further oppurtunies as im not sure if i want to stay in india or not.. what is to be done after my MD will my degree be valid in UK or anyother country???

nike started following practice in UK after MD in psychiatry from India

nike started following specialization in psych after mbbs in india

i have finished my mbbs in india, and very keen about psych. i have heard its easy to get into NZ after doing MD in psych, in india than going after mbbs.. i have cleared neetpg this year and can take up MD psych, in india right now im a little confused what do i do?

Please send an request to above whatsapp number.

For people who find the stats calculations tricky this app can really help. It has a worked maths question at the end of each round

Hi George, I'm surprised they found you partially comparable as with experience they should give you specialist status. Did they say why? My understanding is that they consider specialist with experience of more than 2 years. If feasible,give another ago after some time. Kind Regards, Cata

Hello i am interested too. 009647517107160

please add me 009647517107160

add me please 07902010567.thanks in advance

Upcoming Events
No upcoming events found 
Today's Birthdays
No users celebrating today 
Who's Online (See full list)
There are no registered users currently online

Member Statistics

Popular Contributors